One of those games. Annoying that we lost and don't want to blame the ref and officials too much but pretty clear to me that if we'd been at HQ we'd have won. Losing Croft really hurt us and just hope thst it's not a long term problem. Young Lumb is really getting targeted and while I feel that some of the errors he made tonight were forced through their smart tactics, there should probably be a point where we give ECW a shot. Bigger picture is: we look like a proper rugby league side for the 1st time in ages, and if we stick at it the rewards will come. Get Brad Arthur signed up now.
Another positive performance, pack again held their own against a pack we've struggled against in the past. Defence great in the first half, really pinned them back in their own half.
Attack showed positive signs, Hall's try especially, lots of bodys in motion, something we havent seen for a while. Still lots to work on though.
Ref was pretty poor for both teams, such a soft yellow.
So many positives. Could have done with just a little more luck.
Tom Holroyd gifting Warrington another set on our goal line after jumping out in front of the referee was pretty criminal. Keep our heads there and we might have seen them out. Instead they score on the next set. I don't want to overreact to an individual mistake, but in the wider context of his recent performances he needs to improve his discipline a lot faster otherwise he's out of the side when the likes of Cam Smith is fit, IMO.
Lisone has become the new scapegoat I see. Well, aside from him knocking on at the PTB (which wasn't clearly a knock on to me), I don't think he was bad against Warrington. I agree he's one of our least effective forwards and shouldn't be retained on past and current form. But let's not get carried away.
I dont think Lisone was that bad on Friday and the incorrect play of the ball was harsh, hes not playing many minutes but he doesnt choose when he comes off. Hes clearly 5th choice prop this year and you'd imagine he wont be here next year.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
